Here’s a full review of Come See Me in the Good Light — an intimate, moving documentary about love, identity and the inevitability of mortality.
🎬 Basic Info
- Title: Come See Me in the Good Light (2025) Metacritic+4Wikipedia+4IMDb+4
- Director: Ryan White Wikipedia
- Subjects: Andrea Gibson (poet/activist) and Megan Falley (partner and fellow poet) IMDb+1
- Runtime: ~104 minutes Wikipedia+1
- Synopsis: Following poet Andrea Gibson’s terminal cancer diagnosis, the film explores their life with partner Megan Falley, their work, their fears, their performances — and how love, art, and identity stand firm even when time is limited. Wikipedia+1
✅ What the Film Does Brilliantly
1. Honest, layered emotional storytelling.
Rather than a conventional “illness documentary,” the film blends lived-moments (doctor visits, quips, performances), archival footage and poetic voices to show someone living fully even as death looms. As one review notes:
“It’s not simply a reflection of Andrea and Megan’s relationship… it is about facing death without losing life’s brightness.” Common Sense Media+2InSession Film+2
The film resists pity and instead offers dignity, wit and courage.
2. The relationship at its core.
The way Gibson and Falley support each other — as creatives, partners, lovers facing a brutal diagnosis — gives the documentary its heart. Reviews highlight how this bond anchors the film:
“A documentary of two poets in love… living deeply and feeling their way through every ebb and flow.” Roger Ebert+1
Their shared life becomes both the subject and the lens.
3. Poetic visual & narrative tone.
Given Gibson’s identity as a spoken-word poet, the film honours that by having a lyrical structure: intercuts of performance, quiet domestic moments, reflections on identity, gender, and mortality. As the Guardian review states:
“The film, at times, slips into cliches and obvious metaphors — but that is perhaps part of its persona, which is defined by a poet’s voice.” Roger Ebert
This design lets art and life merge.
4. Celebration of identity and legacy.
Gibson’s story isn’t only about dying — it’s about living, remembering, performing, confronting identity (queer, gender fluid, poet) and leaving something behind. The film’s tone of “celebrate before loss” gives it resonance. Rotten Tomatoes+1
⚠️ Where It Might Not Work for Everyone
1. Familiar structure.
Some critics suggest the documentary follows familiar arcs: diagnosis-treatment-reflection-final performance. From Roger Ebert’s review:
“It sometimes falls into a gentle pattern of clichés and obvious metaphors… but perhaps that reflects its subject.” Roger Ebert
If you’re looking for radical documentary form, this might feel conventional.
2. Imbalance in focus.
While the central relationship is rich, some viewers feel the film could have explored other aspects deeper — for instance, more on the medical/economic implications of illness, or broader contexts. A review points out:
“The details of how the couple supports themselves financially while dealing with illness are glossed over in favour of emotional and philosophical revelation.” Roger Ebert
3. Viewer‐Emotional Weight.
Because the subject is terminal illness and the tone is reflective rather than upbeat, it can feel heavy emotionally. Some may find its truth beautiful but also hard to watch.
🧠 Themes & Key Insights
- Mortality and Living Boldly: Gibson’s recurring line — “every three weeks … living, dying, living, dying” — reminds us time is precious. InSession Film
- Art as Survival: Poetry, performance and voice become tools for navigating identity, illness and purpose.
- Love as Resistance: The partnership between Gibson and Falley shows love not as escape but as grounding and defiance.
- Identity Beyond Illness: Gibson’s queer identity, gender fluid reflections, and radical honesty resist becoming defined only by disease.
- Finding Light in Darkness: The film repeatedly returns to small moments: laughter, dogs, home, performance. These become luminous when “good light” is the goal.
🎯 Final Verdict
Come See Me in the Good Light is a deeply moving, authentic documentary that captures the intersection of art, love, identity and mortality with warmth and bravery. It won multiple festival audience awards and critical acclaim — including a Metascore “universal acclaim” rating of 81. Metacritic
Rating: 8.5/10
- ✅ Why: Honest, heartfelt, visually and emotionally rich, grounded in real lives.
- ⚠️ Why not higher: Conventional documentary arcs, some narrative elements could dig deeper, emotionally heavy content may not suit all.
Recommended For:
- Viewers who love documentaries about art, identity and human relationships.
- Fans of spoken‐word poets, queer stories, intimate filmmaking.
- Anyone open to a film that makes you think about life and gratitude.
About the Author
